<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Business of Technology<title></title>
</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com</link>
	<description>Insights on driving business through technology with Dan Brodie and Rob Woods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:04:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buried in Emails? How I Dug Myself Out. by MEMBRANE FOTOVOLTAICO</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/07/buried-by-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>MEMBRANE FOTOVOLTAICO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=211#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>Stumbled upon your site, interesting article my friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled upon your site, interesting article my friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by Dan Brodie</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael. Thanks for the comments. While MS is slow to bring about WP7, they are following the iPhone model and App store almost identically. 

I am not ignorant of Android and what it can do. I just have a strong opinion that the Microsoft Operating System model will not translate to mobile phones. That model allows to install software from anywhere. While that is appealing to the tech crowd, it translates poorly into success on other platforms. 

People want something elegant and simplistic to use. By allowing apps to be installed from potentially limitless sources, the Android could become easily susceptible to security attacks. It&#039;s also confusing for the average user to manage. It creates a bit of mayhem to update apps/OS. 

MS is requiring devices that carry it to all adhere to a common physical UI which will allow MS to have much better control on the user experience. Also, they will only allow apps to be installed from their app store. They are said to not allow Flash. While they will always be behind Apple, I do believe they will overcome Android fairly quickly by leveraging their Office, Zune and XBox brands. 

I do not personally believe that an open source solution like Linux or Android can claim more than 15% of a given mature and saturated market. I understand that statement will upset many people. In a lot of ways I hope I am wrong as there are many friends and people I like that have both feet fully in open source solutions and projects.

The iPhone Ui is simple and easy to do most things. When my parents and even grand parents can quickly learn and navigate the iPhone OS and install apps, you begin to understand the appeal of the iPhone and its model.

I have nothing personal against Android but I do not see its model working well in the long run. People are buying it now because phones like Palm and even RIM are not doing well on the browser experience. The Android UI is doing well because it more closely resembles the iPhone. As well on any other carriers but AT&amp;T, the Android doesn&#039;t compete with the iPhone. However, on networks that carry the iPhone, the iPhone is dominating sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael. Thanks for the comments. While MS is slow to bring about WP7, they are following the iPhone model and App store almost identically. </p>
<p>I am not ignorant of Android and what it can do. I just have a strong opinion that the Microsoft Operating System model will not translate to mobile phones. That model allows to install software from anywhere. While that is appealing to the tech crowd, it translates poorly into success on other platforms. </p>
<p>People want something elegant and simplistic to use. By allowing apps to be installed from potentially limitless sources, the Android could become easily susceptible to security attacks. It&#8217;s also confusing for the average user to manage. It creates a bit of mayhem to update apps/OS. </p>
<p>MS is requiring devices that carry it to all adhere to a common physical UI which will allow MS to have much better control on the user experience. Also, they will only allow apps to be installed from their app store. They are said to not allow Flash. While they will always be behind Apple, I do believe they will overcome Android fairly quickly by leveraging their Office, Zune and XBox brands. </p>
<p>I do not personally believe that an open source solution like Linux or Android can claim more than 15% of a given mature and saturated market. I understand that statement will upset many people. In a lot of ways I hope I am wrong as there are many friends and people I like that have both feet fully in open source solutions and projects.</p>
<p>The iPhone Ui is simple and easy to do most things. When my parents and even grand parents can quickly learn and navigate the iPhone OS and install apps, you begin to understand the appeal of the iPhone and its model.</p>
<p>I have nothing personal against Android but I do not see its model working well in the long run. People are buying it now because phones like Palm and even RIM are not doing well on the browser experience. The Android UI is doing well because it more closely resembles the iPhone. As well on any other carriers but AT&#038;T, the Android doesn&#8217;t compete with the iPhone. However, on networks that carry the iPhone, the iPhone is dominating sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by Michael Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>This article comes across as EXTREMELY ignorant of Android, but wait to see your logic trumping up the constantly name changing mobile OS from Microsoft.

I spoke directly to Steve Ballmer on Mobile Phone 7 after it debuted and I am not nearly as convinced as apparently yourself on it (caveat being unless Microsoft ends up purchasing RIM/Blackberry)

I do like what Apple is doing with iAd but can see Google trumping it with the AdMob purchase (upon the FTC approval which is more likely due to iAd) as it will become the DoubleClick of mobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article comes across as EXTREMELY ignorant of Android, but wait to see your logic trumping up the constantly name changing mobile OS from Microsoft.</p>
<p>I spoke directly to Steve Ballmer on Mobile Phone 7 after it debuted and I am not nearly as convinced as apparently yourself on it (caveat being unless Microsoft ends up purchasing RIM/Blackberry)</p>
<p>I do like what Apple is doing with iAd but can see Google trumping it with the AdMob purchase (upon the FTC approval which is more likely due to iAd) as it will become the DoubleClick of mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by Dan Brodie</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>Thanks mobiThinking,

I do have doubts that Apple will support other mobile platforms. Also, with their acquisition of Siri today, it appears that Apple may be exploring the combination of their own mobile search and advertising system integrated at the OS level. I&#039;ll try to find the specific article that suggests the ad market on iPhone OS devices may be around $8B in 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks mobiThinking,</p>
<p>I do have doubts that Apple will support other mobile platforms. Also, with their acquisition of Siri today, it appears that Apple may be exploring the combination of their own mobile search and advertising system integrated at the OS level. I&#8217;ll try to find the specific article that suggests the ad market on iPhone OS devices may be around $8B in 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by Dan Brodie</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jazzo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jazzo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by Jazzo</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 03:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Nice article Dan. I do hope they announce it today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Dan. I do hope they announce it today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Mobile Advertising by mobiThinking</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2010/04/future-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>mobiThinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=175#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>It would be disappointing if Apple channeled Quattro&#039;s efforts into just servicing ads into applications on Apple platforms. While the Apple platforms are much hyped (helped by misleading charts like the AdMob one used here), they are still a pretty small part of the mobile device market and down-loadable applications from largely unknown publishers won&#039;t have the same attraction to brand advertisers. Quattro had built up a good network of premium mobile publishers that served ads to all mobile devices – and was beginning to get traction among brand advertisers – it would be a shame to let that go to the wall, in order to focus solely on Apple&#039;s proprietary mobile platforms. If you want to know more about Quattro or any of the other leading mobile ad networks, please see this guide: http://mobithinking.com/mobile-ad-network-guide</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be disappointing if Apple channeled Quattro&#8217;s efforts into just servicing ads into applications on Apple platforms. While the Apple platforms are much hyped (helped by misleading charts like the AdMob one used here), they are still a pretty small part of the mobile device market and down-loadable applications from largely unknown publishers won&#8217;t have the same attraction to brand advertisers. Quattro had built up a good network of premium mobile publishers that served ads to all mobile devices – and was beginning to get traction among brand advertisers – it would be a shame to let that go to the wall, in order to focus solely on Apple&#8217;s proprietary mobile platforms. If you want to know more about Quattro or any of the other leading mobile ad networks, please see this guide: <a href="http://mobithinking.com/mobile-ad-network-guide" rel="nofollow">http://mobithinking.com/mobile-ad-network-guide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Age of Internet TV by Jamie L.</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2008/05/the-age-of-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. I&#039;ve been debating on whether to focus on mobile and tv (which will become a mobile advertising platform as well!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. I&#8217;ve been debating on whether to focus on mobile and tv (which will become a mobile advertising platform as well!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet versus Cell Phone Usage by Mark Layton</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2008/05/internet-versus-cell-phone-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Layton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=5#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan! Great to see you are blogging now! Not sure if you remember me but we met a few years ago at SES San Jose when Canada beat the US at the SES Bobsledding Competition! Hope all is well in Canada!

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan! Great to see you are blogging now! Not sure if you remember me but we met a few years ago at SES San Jose when Canada beat the US at the SES Bobsledding Competition! Hope all is well in Canada!</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet versus Cell Phone Usage by Jessie Long</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2008/05/internet-versus-cell-phone-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=5#comment-4</guid>
		<description>That’s crazy! I should be developing for Mobile!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s crazy! I should be developing for Mobile!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New View on Mobile Tech by Mike W</title>
		<link>http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/2008/05/a-new-view-on-mobile-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 06:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebusinessoftechnology.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the take Dan. I hadn&#039;t seen that yet. Looks like a great opportunity for businesses to prepare for the next tech wave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the take Dan. I hadn&#8217;t seen that yet. Looks like a great opportunity for businesses to prepare for the next tech wave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

